My paying Autumn to read has been a miserable failure. Well, maybe not. Some would say it failed because she decided after making about 15 bucks that she was done and showed no further interest in pursuing reading on her own. Remember, I never pressured her to read. I just set a mutually agreed upon amount to a mutually agreed upon series of books, after asking her if she was even willing to undertake this task in the first place. So, Alfie Kohn might say it was a success because it absolutely demonstrated that unless one is intrinsically motivated, they are going to lose interest in whatever it is they are doing, no matter the 'reward'. The fact that she had some serious coin to make, but lost interest after about a week is quite telling. The kid likes money. Apparently, though, money doesn't mean as much to her as I thought (and I really *love* that!). Below is an excerpt from Sandra Dodd's website. It was a gentle smack in my face as to what I wasn't letting happen. Read on and you'll see. Therefore, for Autumn's sake, I am giving up and letting her come to reading in her own good time.
ALERT- ALERT -ALERT THE FOLLOWING POST IS NOT MINE. IT IS FROM SANDRA DODD'S WEBSITE
The Deeper Effect of a Child Learning to Read: Confidence
a Mom in a discussion online: A homeschooling friend has shared that she feels we need to teach the basics then unschool them.
Joyce Fetteroll:Your friend is wrong. If she's never experienced a child who learned to read or do math without instruction then of course she's not going to be able to imagine it's possible.
Sandra Dodd: If what the friend is imagining is that a child who reads will then acquire all the other knowledge on her own, that's not the worst vision in the world If what the friend is hoping is the child will get past the point that the mom worries about getting in trouble or failing entirely, I can understand her reasoning.
If she REALLY wants to unschool, though, it will help her immensely to see how many ways children can learn without reading. And it will help the children immensely to have the deep confidence that they can learn without instruction. Any child who has learned to read without "being taught" (and I have three of them) cannot doubt that he can learn other things without finding a teacher and following a prescribed course.
Holly takes fiddle lessons. In the course of a month she has private, paired and group sessions. She really likes that. She shows me what she learns and I play with her at home. I found her some songs and a book and she goes outside of just what the teacher has assigned. Many music students don't. School-trained, or just lacking courage and joy, they will only play what the teacher "makes" them play, or what the teacher tells them they can play, without thought to the idea of figuring out that through experimentation and analysis, they can figure out themselves what other songs might be within their range of ability.
Kirby studies karate at a dojo where he's gone for seven years. He's part of a longterm group, there are many adults there who have watched his progress all those years, and once a week he teaches a class of younger children. So although there is a prescribed course, there are several different aspects and there is flexibility to the learning and activities he's involved in there.
Had I just taught my kids to read and THEN unschooled, they would not be the calmly confident people they are today. They might be saying "Okay, mom, time to teach me division" or "Mom, you didn't teach me to spell yet." Instead of that, I help them learn whatever is in front of them.
Somebody asked Rosie, yesterday, who taught her to read. I was there, listening. She hemmed and hawed a little - then said, brightly, "My own BRAIN taught me to read." As if that answered it. The other kid (one of her girl scout friends) was questioning her about homeschooling, not looking for THAT kind of answer at all...but Rosie couldn't figure out any other way to answer the question. I helped out by stepping in and saying, "She means she taught herself."